Moose Stuff
Active Member
Stupid people might.
So a good portion of this board then.
Stupid people might.
Lol. You know, the thought wasn't original to me. I've actually heard it from interviews with 2 or 3 retired major league pitchers. Of course, it's a "weird critique" because those guys don't have a clue what they're talking about compared to all the self-important experts around here.
I think K:BB ratio is a great stat when projecting a pitcher's "stuff" for the next level.I'm very open to the idea that ERA is an overrated stat and I'm also a huge advocate of the importance of stats like K/BB ratio. That being said, the number of inherited runners that relievers allow to score is extremely low on the list of reasons why ERA might be overrated.
Sure. I'm not saying it's useless. Just saying that when I want some insight into how well a pitcher is performing I'm going straight to 4 numbers...... innings pitched, hits, strikeouts, and walks. I note the ERA but it doesn't have much impact on my opinion of the player.I think K:BB ratio is a great stat when projecting a pitcher's "stuff" for the next level.
And obviously a pitcher's defense behind him can affect his ERA. But I still think a pitcher's ERA is a solid stat to tell you how good he is at this level.
Sure. I'm not saying it's useless. Just saying that when I want some insight into how well a pitcher is performing I'm going straight to 4 numbers...... innings pitched, hits, strikeouts, and walks. I note the ERA but it doesn't have much impact on my opinion of the player.
Especially with high school pitchers and the lunacy of how games are scored. I had a coach tell me a couple of years ago that if a kid got on by a walk or HBP and eventually scored, he was counting it as unearned because he had been given a "gift" by the pitcher and gifts aren't earned. I less than politely told him that he was a fool and that he should let the rules of scoring determine things like that.
Not to mention the 17 year old stat girl or team mom that's keeping the official book that thinks every time a kid gets on base it's a hit.
OK. I'm going to only be slightly annoyed at that comment. Trust me, if I'm doing the book, every on base ISN'T a hit.
Not what he saidOn the PGA Tour there is always the "best player to have never won a major". If there is an equivalent in college baseball it is most definitely not TCU. Maybe when FSU gets that 23 trips without a championship monkey off their back we will take the throne. Until then the Frogs just need to keep getting there and giving themselves the chance to win it all. Regular appearances without a championship won't hurt recruiting.
And yes, we all want a championship. But we aren't in "needing to win it" territory yet.
Lol. You know, the thought wasn't original to me. I've actually heard it from interviews with 2 or 3 retired major league pitchers. Of course, it's a "weird critique" because those guys don't have a clue what they're talking about compared to all the self-important experts around here.
ksfrog is the unofficial bookkeeper and pitch counter for section 202 at Lupton.There are certainly exceptions.
Not to mention the 17 year old stat girl or team mom that's keeping the official book that thinks every time a kid gets on base it's a hit.
He said we need to win. Not sure what you got out of it. But thanks for your average opinion.Not what he said
Not even close actually
Don't think I mentioned anything about inherited runners. I simply mean there are several non-pitching factors that figure into ERA, like quality of defense and even the competence or objectivity of the official scorer. I didn't say ERA is worthless. Just that it's overrated.I'm very open to the idea that ERA is an overrated stat and I'm also a huge advocate of the importance of stats like K/BB ratio. That being said, the number of inherited runners that relievers allow to score is extremely low on the list of reasons why ERA might be overrated.
They were discussing college pitchers.Were they pitchers who were trying to explain why their career ERA's were too high? Because it sounds like they were pitchers who were trying to explain why their career ERA's were too high.
You specifically mentioned a pitcher's ERA being influenced by the pitchers who relieve him. If that wasn't a reference to inherited runners then it makes even less sense than I thought it did.Don't think I mentioned anything about inherited runners. I simply mean there are several non-pitching factors that figure into ERA, like quality of defense and even the competence or objectivity of the official scorer. I didn't say ERA is worthless. Just that it's overrated.
He was saying that the people who keep telling everyone "you should all just stop analyzing everything because we got here and everything else is gravy" need to swallow that and realize we still can win it all - so we need to keep focus on winning it all and look back on the season AFTER the seasonHe said we need to win. Not sure what you got out of it. But thanks for your average opinion.