• The KillerFrogs

scheiss Lincoln Riley

notyalc

notyalc

Active Member
File this in the BFD (apply sarcasm font) category. I'm surprised Riley didn't grab Baker's crotch for him.
 
Last edited:
Pharm Frog

Pharm Frog

Full Member
Fantastic slip of the tongue on sports radio (Cowherd?). Some dude named Sean misspoke trying to say “you can’t go around grabbing your crotch” and instead said the rooster word. Great slip.
 
ATC Frog

ATC Frog

Active Member
Sooner coworkers blaming KU for Baker’s antics this weekend. Also blaming the KU coach for not reprimanding his players for not shaking BM’s hand at the coin toss.

Almost forgot, they also blamed ESPN for not utilizing the 7 sec delay and not even showing he crotch-grabbing incident to begin with.

So basically everyone’s fault except BM.

Most unsurprising thing ever? Perhaps.
 
K

kidkarr

Full Member
BoondocksFrog said:
Look I dislike Mayfield as much as the next guy, but if Trevone did something similar we would have been agreeable with this punishment.
Click to expand...
Not exactly, when T resisted arrest and went to jail, it cost him his final game in a frog uni and bowl game at that. Mayfield didn’t even miss a play against snatch face U.
 
K

kidkarr

Full Member
Pharm Frog said:
Nope. The Big 12 denied it at least once and maybe twice but Boren twisted arms and necks and threw his OU weight around to get it changed AND retroactively unapplied. Some conferences still have this rule unless changed recently. If BM had transferred to Iowa State or Kansas, or Baylor, or Kansas State, he would have been done last year.
Click to expand...
Bakers was a lil different because he was not on scholarship at tech.
 
Pharm Frog

Pharm Frog

Full Member
kidkarr said:
Bakers was a lil different because he was not on scholarship at tech.
Click to expand...

Baker was not different at all. He was subject to the same non-secret rule that all were. You could argue that it shouldn’t have been a rule for a walk-on but it was. He was not different and knew the implications of his transfer when he did it. He just demanded a rule change to take effect retroactively.
 
Zubaz

Zubaz

Member
Pharm Frog said:
Baker was not different at all. He was subject to the same non-secret rule that all were. You could argue that it shouldn’t have been a rule for a walk-on but it was. He was not different and knew the implications of his transfer when he did it. He just demanded a rule change to take effect retroactively.
Click to expand...
Yes, he petitioned for a stupid rule to be modified. As is anyone's right....especially someone that has leverage. Again, he was always eligible to play in 2017, and it would have been stupid of the Big 12 to let him go play somewhere else (to say nothing of the disruption to his educaHAHAHAHAHA sorry I can't finish that with a straight face).

Saying "it's the rule", and then justa kinda handwaving that it was a bad rule leaves out a really important part of the story. Stupid rules should be changed.
 

Latest posts

Top